The Only Drunken Son of A
Bitch to Land this Airplane
"Flight" (2012) Review
Oftentimes in film it is helpful to
actually like the protagonist; to find some worthwhile aspect to their
character no matter how loathsome. This is oftentimes a difficult task,
especially in a film about the collapse of a man's life as he struggles with
alcoholism, yet it is ultimately the film's responsibility to overcome this
challenge. This is not something which happened in Robert Zemeckis' 2012 film
"Flight".
The film opens on the morning of a flight
from Orlando to Atlanta and quickly reveals Whip Whitaker's (Denzel Washington)
character flaw; his dependence on alcohol and cocaine as he consumes both in
the company of one of the flight attendants, Katerina Marquez (Nadine
Velazquez) who walks around the room searching for her panties for the first
few minutes, which is about as exciting as the film gets. As revealed in every
trailer for the film, the plane has a mechanical breakdown and the plane heads
into a nosedive from which pilot Whitaker manages to land the plane saving all
but six fateful souls on board as he handles the situation with an
unconventional approach; mainly turning the airplane upside-down to try and
regain some stability. Whitaker later insists that he's the only one who could
have landed the plane, which arrogant as it may be, is crucial to Washington's
character arc as he moves from being free yet imprisoned towards, well... the
other direction. From the field where the plane is crashed, the plot seems to
explode as questions emerge of Whitaker's alcoholism and union leader Charlie
Anderson (Bruce Greenwood) tries to conceal Whitaker's true nature with the aid
of Hugh Lang (Don Cheadle) a high profile lawyer from Chicago. As the story
continues, Whitaker's dependence on alcohol becomes more apparent, as does his
need for cocaine which is provided by his noble friend Harling Mays (John
Goodman) as new revelations in the investigation of the crash emerge.
Intermixed with this awfully predictable plot is a small and incomplete love
story between Whitaker and Nicole (Kelly Reilly), a heroin addict who begins to
turn her life around just as she meets Whitaker at the hospital. The plot
sounds complicated yet ends up seeming devoid of meaning as it attempts to take
a standard eighty minute long film and stretch it out with as much emotional
weight as it can muster. To help in this task, John Gatins the writer of such
classics as "Reel Steel" (2011) utilizes Jesus freaks and the concept
of God's hand in the crash which remains throughout the film in-cohesive with
the plot and tacked on to attempt to engage the audience in thought. This
sounds a bit too harsh, yet when it comes to a film which wants to condor it's
self Oscar worthy material (because honestly, what other reason is there to
release a film like this at a time of year like this), then that film needs to
be up to snuff when it comes to content. Though aiding his inevitable bid for
best original screenplay was the dialogue which did not seem at all stagey and
helped to strengthen his hollow characters.
At the helm of this Titanic, Robert
Zemeckis, the director whom the world has to thank for "Back to the
Future" (1985), a film which was actually very memorable and wonderful on
every repeated viewing, save the forced ones where the film feels like nails in
one's eye sockets. This film follows a recent lineup of directorial failures
for Zemeckis including "Polar Express" (2004) "Beowulf"
(2007)*, and "A Christmas Carol" (2009), and was, though markedly
better than any other in that awful cannon, was still not remarkable. Zemeckis
showed a clear understanding of the medium with very traditional shot
establishment and some interesting cinematography, yet little original
messaging through shots. His 'weather is a force of god' bit with storm clouds
following Whitaker around was obvious and a bit too overt for it to actually be
considered clever.
The film's strongest suit, it's acting, was
actually very commendable yet not Oscar worthy. While Denzel and Cheadle, the
two strongest actors in the film, try to engage the viewer, their screen
presence is not nearly enough. Though both give commanding performances, their
characters are not actually good characters, nor are they well conceived as
they are introduced and hardly change throughout the course of the film, Mr.
Washington's character only changing in the last five minutes of the seemingly
endless picture. In addition to this, the audience is not told anything about
the characters, save a few details about their lives and a few obvious
motivations. All of this leaves the audience wondering whether or not they
should actually care about either of these men muchness anyone in the film as
they are all so obviously constructions of a forcibly imagined reality that
they come off as simply characters and not actual people. This all being said
(and really that's more plot than anything) the acting is fine, but surely not
the season's best.
The film ultimately felt like a waste of
time and energy. This could be said about many films, yet this film in
particular was disappointing. Thought the film tried adamantly to entertain, it
felt like absolutely nothing was accomplished in the seemingly eight hours I
sat in the theater, and whatever did change in Captain Whitaker's life seemed
utterly pointless as I, the viewer, didn't care if he changed because I didn't
like him to begin with. In short, the film, in my opinion, was doomed from the
beginning and probably needed to be rethought. This sentiment hurt a bit more
when I remembered I was charged ten dollars for my ticket.
As the credits began to roll, I was a bit
angry, yet ultimately remembered that, in some small way, the film had
succeeded in making me sit in a theater and watch the story of a man's life
fall apart for over two hours. So I'll leave on this note, see the movie,
formulate your own opinion, and if you like it, than you like it. It will most
likely not win any Oscars (if this year's batch of Oscar contenders is at all
competitive), but it could be your favorite movie of all time. And that's okay!
Flight is Rated R for for drug and alcohol
abuse, language, sexuality/nudity and an intense action sequences.
Stars: 5/10
* Interestingly enough, in the trivia for
"Flight", one person made the comment that "Flight" was
Zemeckis' first live action film since "Cast Away," which I
immediately reacted to by marking that Beowulf was live action then, upon
reexamining the film realized that no, in fact it was creepy cartoons; a
favorite of Zemeckis' which is largely credited with being the downfall of
"Mars Needs Moms" (2011), the worst financial loss for a film until
"John Carter" (2012) came out a year later.
No comments:
Post a Comment